Ten reasons why gay marriage is wrong. All are hilarious, so don’t worry. Via Steve Gilliard.

01) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

02) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.

03) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

04) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn’t changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can’t marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.

05) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Britany Spears’ 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.

06) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn’t be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren’t full yet, and the world needs more children.

07) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

08) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That’s why we have only one religion in America.

09) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That’s why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.

10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven’t adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2006/03/gay-marriage-sucks.html

FAIR v. Rumsfield was exclusively about gay rights. Specifically, the right of liberal law professors and universities to ostracize the military recruiters because of the military’s “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

The Solomon Amendment, according to the law schools (at least the 24 with the guts to be named publicly), is anti-gay. Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh’s statement upon learning about the decision illustrates that he believed FAIR was all about gay rights:

We look forward to the day when the government gives all of our students–without regard to their sexual orientation–an equal opportunity to serve our country by working in our Nation’s armed forces.

Yes, FAIR v. Rumsfeld is about morality. FAIR’s ultimate goal is not ridding itself of the military presence on campus, but forcing the government and Americans to accept the gay lifestyle. And, no I do not see any moral virtue in FAIR’s position.

Also, you contend that FAIR’s ultimate goal is to “overthrow the moral tradition of…the family unit.” Do you really believe that the top law schools in the country got together for the explicit purpose of overthrowing morals? Can you not see a any moral virtue in their position?