Rightank

On Monday, the United States Supreme Court handed all the law professors engaged in homosexual activism a lesson in humility–and the law. In Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., CJ Roberts wrote the unanimous decision informing Eskridge et al. to take a hike and put your money where your mouth is.

It must be exasperating for liberal law professoriat to come to grips with reality–the reality of losing big time on a gay rights issue. In most lawschools, gays and lesbians tout their agenda brazenly and openly. At my alma mater, roughly 95% of the professors sent around a letter decrying the military’s policy of “Don’t ask, don’t tell” and puffed out their chests exclaiming their dismay while chastizing the troops from their incubated office spaces. It was rather patronizing of them, but heck, law school is about promoting an agenda and not about teaching law.

Similiarly, the homosexual agenda isn’t about “equality.” Rather, it is the design of a tiny minority to overthrow the moral tradition of America by undermining through litigation and fearmongering the traditional family unit, particularly heterosexual marriage. You see, everyone who opposes gays and lesbian “rights” is a homophobe and the root of his or her opposition is seething hatred. Homosexual proponents believe that any logical argument contra same-sex marriage simply cannot exist and any argument proffered against gay adoption, gay marriage, etc., is vacuous and meritless–which, of course, is absolutely false.

Rumsfeld is great for America and for our military. I give it 8 thumbs up.

I apologize (again) for not posting as regularly as I have in the past. It has been sheer agony not being able to blog. I haven’t been able to put in my two bits on VP Cheney’s hunting accident or the Dubai contract ports debacle. Nonetheless, I think things are beginning to settle down and I’ll try to post a couple of times this week. Thanks for your patience.

Tank