Dot.com Millionaries and Peasants
Senator Barbara Boxer is out of her freakin’ mind. Will liberals ever get a grip? The election is OVER. It’s went bye-bye. It’s done. That includes you too, Senator Boxer.
If you didn’t hear, Senator Boxer screamed loudly today about the “franchise,” the right of each American (not illegal I assume . . . separate question: Can you be illegal and be American?) to vote. She said that one’s vote should be counted regardless of status, from the dot.com millionaire to hapless peasant (OK, I threw in “hapless”). Now, it might be just me, but, I do not know any American peasants. Does she think of herself as a noble, and her constituents peasants? Is a homeless person a peasant (in Berkley, they’d be nobles)? It is absolutely hilarious to believe that if you’re rich your vote counts more than a poor person or vice versa, if you’re poor that your vote counts more that if you’re rich. When I cast my vote for Bush in November, the poll worker did not ask me how much money I made before he gave me permission to vote. Maybe I’m just the exception.
Here’s more of what loud-mouth Boxer said, quoting her remarks from the Senate floor: “Every citizen of this country who is registered to vote should be guaranteed that their vote matters, that their vote is counted, and that in the voting booth of their community, their vote has as much weight as the vote of any Senator, any Congressperson, any President, any cabinet member, or any CEO of any Fortune 500 Corporation.”
How pathetically distasteful, Senator Boxer. Do you really believe this? How could anyone with an IQ over 35? Bush won fair and square (in 2000 and 2004), so get over it, please.
Maybe California should consider recalling Boxer as well.